1. Charles Haley. Is this the guy that won 5 Super Bowl rings? All Pro a few times. Hall of Famer. Does that give him the right to be the moral judge of the Pats actions? Well, kinda. But only if his off field behavior was not abhorrent. How do you describe or define the behavior of a guy that takes out his penis and strokes it in the locker room and team meetings? What word would you use. “Abhorrent” sounds right. “Despicable” is pretty good. That’s the behavior attributed to Haley by writer Jeff Pearlman in his book “Boys Will be Boys”.And you would never ever allow that guy to be the moral arbiter of your actions. Anyone that behaves like that should keep his mouth shut whenever morality or ethical issues are discussed. Another word to describe a guy like that who would open his mouth on those issues is “clueless”. Which is a perfect lead in to:
2. Jerry Rice. I would love to interview Rice and ask him one question, only one, I promise. Even crotch grabbing Marshon Lynch might answer only one question if you guaranteed that you would only ask one.
“Jerry, do you consider your cheating with illegal stickum to catch the ball better, to get a competitive advantage, to help you win multiple Super Bowl championships and help you get in the HOF, do you consider your cheating different from what you accuse the Pats of doing?” There. That’s only one rather long question. Can we get one of the many hack sports guys and gals to ask Judge Jerry Rice that?

Seriously you two mopes, didn’t you ever think that we would be all over your hypocrisy? This is New England baby! We’re smaht!! Not like Fredo. I mean really smart. And didn’t you ever think that we would now consider the great Joe Montana’s 4 Super Bowl rings “tainted” because of his cheating dog teammate?

Charles Haley and Jerry Rice. One immoral crude jerk. One dope. Both CLUELESS.